Goals and Rationale
1.1) Goals
We intend to
build a Program on e-Planning, to address the new problems and consequent research questions emerging
from the new technology context and its wide and deep impacts across all
planning-related areas. Such Program will integrate new academic degrees /
curricula offering, a research agenda, national and international exchange
programs and special academia-civil society-industry liaison programs. The key
component of this Program will be a Joint PhD on e-Planning.
We envision
this Program on e-Planning to be supported by and/or contributing to, 3
institutional components:
1 – A Portuguese
e-Planning Center, as a Focal
Point of Excellence, based on a multidisciplinary "consortium" within
Portuguese Academia, with strong participation of related entities from public
and private sectors and civil society;
2 – A
strategic institutional relationship with USA Centers of Excellence on
e-Planning, such as M.I.T.;
3 – A European
Research Network for e-Planning,
as a Network of Excellence (NOE), evolving to an Institute for e-Planning, within the framework of the EU Joint Research
Centre, with possible headquarters in Portugal.
One key
transversal component of the Program on e-Planning will be a network of
Laboratories of Technology for Social Sciences, which may require setting-up
new facilities but mostly adapting and requalifying existing resources.
In the current "consortium" for
e-Planning, there is a clear added value in the complementarities of DUSP-MIT
and FCT-UNL / FCSH-UNL / ICS-UL / FC-UL / ISCSP-UTL / DSP-UA /
ESE-IPVC schools of knowledge and experience. In several areas where these
institutions already excel and are at the forefront of innovation, it clearly
provides a chance to obtain critical mass for effective leadership in
pioneering research programs and course / curricula innovation. We
aim for this Program on e-Planning to become a
world-wide reference in the field.
1.2) The rationale for
e-Planning at MIT-Portugal
We have no doubt that this
field is of strategic importance for Portugal, as it is for the USA, where MIT
is taking the leadership with initiatives such as the "Urban Information
Systems" agenda at the Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning.
We believe also that it fits
within the top priorities for the MIT-Portugal agreement in discussion.
The MIT-Portugal initiative (and its funding core) was born
under the "umbrella" of the "Plan for Technology" of the Portuguese
Government. We believe that a
special effort towards modern technology is of particular importance to a country
as Portugal.
A strategic "push" on technology
requires the integrated engagement of many different key disciplines. It is not
by chance that the M.I.T.- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, includes many
different schools: Engineering, Architecture and Planning, Management,
Humanities, etc. It is the combination of excellence in all these schools and
bodies of knowledge, in close cooperation (with multiple cross-departmental,
multidisciplinary research centers offerings joint courses and advanced
degrees, as well mandatory courses on a core of social and humanities subjects
for all students), that produced a top-notch Institute of Technology,
a key player in national and international development.
It would be therefore a
limited approach to view a "Technology Plan" pertaining only to the domain of
engineering, even if associated with economy and management.
In fact, there is extensive
evidence that it is not enough to "push" technology into a country, an
enterprise, or an institution, to obtain positive results. Without
understanding the mechanisms of assimilation and most of all its multiple
impacts in society, many of them not immediately apparent, the full benefits of
the new technology will not bare fruit, and may in fact have counterproductive
effects (f.i. unbalanced systems, non-sustainable paths, inequity, social
exclusion, etc.)
This is why we believe it
makes full sense to have a focus on technology, but a focus that is satisfied
by mobilizing the engineering and management schools and also the schools of
sciences and applied social sciences; in particular those among them that have
a strong connection with technology. In reality, some of these social
scientists not only study the impact of technology but are also part of its
development (some have both an engineering and social science background),
extending technology innovation beyond the enterprise universe, to public
institutions, NGOs, services and procedures. Filling the void of "market
failures", promoting both development and social justice with equity.
The prestigious MIT school of
engineering is at the forefront of many technology breakthroughs. However, the
top edge of technology innovation is not a reserve of engineering; for
instance, the well known Media Lab, home of indisputable technology advances,
was born and belongs to the equally prestigious MIT School of Architecture and
Planning. This is also the case of the "Urban Information Systems" research
cluster at DUSP, a pioneer in GIS / Multimedia tools technology research and
development.
As it happens, there is
already a steady history of institutional collaboration between those MIT
applied social sciences schools, such as DUSP-MIT, and Portuguese Academia. MIT
being a Center of Excellence in both engineering and social sciences, it would
make no sense to exclude any of them from the MIT-Portugal initiative.
It is therefore only natural
that the Portuguese GovernmentÕs "Plan for Technology" expresses consistently
this more comprehensive approach. This Plan proclaims the need to foster a
joint effort on engineering and all sciences relevant to society, including
social sciences. The following excerpts make this clear:
"The ÔPlan for
TechnologyÕ is part of a new social contract for the modernization of society
and the economic growth of the country. It is not just about the science at the
Labs and Universities, or the technology developed and adapted by enterprises.
It is about defending science and technology as a condition for the economic
progress, but also cultural and social progress, as an instrument of growth, but
also the base for a culture of rigor and openness, pillars of the free thought
and guaranty of the future of the democratic life (...)"
"(...) one of the
strategic vectors of the ÔPlan for Technology" (...) to assure the following
strategic objectives at long and middle range: 1) To promote a modern
citizenship, for which the use of the information and communication
technologies will be a normal tool for access to information, to education, to
work and to participation in public life (...) 3) To assure transparency,
simplicity, and efficiency of the public administration acts relevant to
citizens and enterprises (...)"
"(on Public
Administration): The international economic integration and the emergence of
new information technologies lead to rethink the role of the state in society
(...)"
"These integrated
strategies to support innovation confer to the Public Administration a vital
role in the increase of country competitiveness, suggesting initiatives that
aim as much the modernization of the administration as the approximation of the
Public Administration to citizens and enterprises. Still in 2006 and as part of
the initiative "European Information Society 2010", the European Commission
will launch a set of measures to support the modernization of public services
in Europe, stimulating the electronic government and a better service provided
to citizens. Other initiatives seek to foster the creation and sharing of
knowledge in Public Administration, and its availability to civil society and
enterprises. (...)"
In consequence, many of the
Plan Measures are directly within the realm of the e-Planning agenda. Here are
a few examples:
¯
"internet
for new citizenship" (...)
¯
"simplification
and efficiency of the tools for land use planning" (...)
¯
"geographic
information (...) to help planning"
¯
"electronic
democracy"
It is also not by chance that
the same Program of the elected Portuguese Government gives as well strong
emphasis to the need to balance a) fostering a market-driven economy with b) a
careful regulatory framework; calling the attention to the new challenges that
represent this regulatory effort and reform, when the current trends on merges
and consolidation (within globalization) may "capture"(sic[1])
the regulatory capacity and hinder competition and modernization. It follows
that a strategic "push" on technology, intended to have a wide impact on both
the public and private sector, cannot afford to promote technology development
without promoting research on the new regulatory frameworks required by
modernization.
In our view, we have now a very good opportunity to make an important progress on both arenas, within the excellent MIT-Portugal initiative, promoted by the "Technology Plan" of the Portuguese Government. In particular, in this moment, we have the conditions to move forward with building a joint agenda on e-Planning. We have a set of highly qualified people at MIT and Portuguese Academia, fully supported by their Departments and Institutes, with a clear view of the common objectives, ready to work in a cohesive way, able to complement and integrate the current lines of cooperation already in motion for the MIT-Portugal agreement.